Large California study concludes soda consumption and obesity is no doubt (NaturalNews) is very similar to that once great Tobacco and nicotine, soda ash industry, and high fructose corn syrup producers in the United States claimed a pair of the link between soda consumption and obesity, a state of denial interesting turning point. “Soft drinks will not make you fat,” they insist. At the same time, Americans are falling year by year how crazy binge drinking carbonated beverages and liquid large number of sugar diabetes and obesity rates continue to rise constantly. Of course, diet must be done with it, right? California, a new study, the soda company can no longer hide behind the defense of uncertainty when it comes to soft drink consumption and obesity among the links. This study examined a large number of drinking carbonated beverages 43 000 adults and 4,000 young people used and found this: One or more soft drinks daily consumption of 27 per cent increase in the chance of obesity. Up to 62 adults who drink soda every day at least 1% of overweight or obese. The study also shows that California is gulping soft drinks at an unprecedented rate: at least one soda a day consumed 41 percent of children, adolescents and 62 percent of adults 24%. Throughout the study, another shocking results showed: The average annual consumption of soda fresh from the California Youth liquid sugar consumption 39 pounds. Unfortunately, these studies did not look at rates of diabetes and bone loss – the causes of osteoporosis in phosphate soft drinks, even in men – but no doubt, a soda consumption and a similar correlation between the disease, too. In this sweetener and diet soda have not read the whole question in this study, but this is another study, is likely to defer important area for many years, and drinking diet soda, which is diagnosed with brain cancer The number of people who can no longer be denied. We are warning this year is interesting that natural health champions have been concerned about the company warned that over the years it all. Whether we are talking about themselves and NaturalNews or Dr. Julian Whitaker, and even goes back to Weston Price, we have a wide range of cola consumption on the risk long before they appear on the radar of the mainstream argument. Now, obesity and diabetes in a more mainstream health authorities finally starting to piece together to find soft drinks bad catastrophic epidemic on public health. There is no doubt: when the increase in soda consumption, therefore, obesity rates. With higher rates of obesity, it will automatically greatly improves diabetes, cancer, heart disease, depression and very expensive treatment of other causes. Ultimately, this means that sodium consumption has greatly increased the health care of any person because of the high cost of sodium consumption cause high cost of treatment of disease, higher interest rates. I guess every one U.S. dollar consumers spend on soft drinks, and more long-term costs of a health value of the dollar is at the same time to create. In addition to these direct costs paid by consumers, they are paid by taxpayers and insurance customers. Therefore, health care reform must substantially reduce the need to do some first world countries, caustic soda consumption. You can not afford adequate health care and the people of soda consumption boom. How to reduce the consumption significantly reduced the consumption of soda pop is easier than you think. It just takes some political backbone. . . And is ready to stop pussyfooting politicians trying to please the rich and powerful, soft drink companies solve the problem. Now is the time to start treatment, because they are really soft drink companies: public health and financial parasites who drain through the health-care costs their products increased, causing the enemy of public funds. Their ad promises happiness, but their products provide the disease. In reducing the consumption of alcoholic beverages first step is to ban all soft drinks advertising. In fact, it can only be a necessary step. In short, soda water is clear, scientific proof of danger to public health, and that, in order to protect our country’s young people, products, represents a clear and present danger to public health will no longer allow any form of advertising: no TV, magazines , sporting events, and even online advertising. They are still free, of course, where you can describe your products your website. They just can not advertise in other sites. But what is freedom of speech? Without the United States Constitution guarantees all individuals the freedom of speech? In fact, he does, but I think – I know that this is far better understanding of the constitutional lawyer may not agree with me on this – there is no freedom of speech guaranteed in the Constitution is not in the company. “Correct” an invention of what the Constitution says, the real liberal interpretation. I do not believe a company should have the same rights as individuals, freedom of expression, because a person is often full of “freedom of speech in a multi-billion company, can buy virtually unlimited broadcast time” drowned. We can not tax soft drinks do? Another popular proposal is to tax the heck out of soft drinks, making them more expensive, to stop them from the consumer’s purchase. If you introduce a new tax on the poor believe that this is a good idea, because the poor far more than the rich to purchase and consumption of sodium, to create a “soda tax” is mainly a tax on the poor. I do not agree to new taxes are used to the idea of shaping consumer behavior. Why? As the current dispute taxes and government subsidies are so complex and confusing, have lost any attachment common sense. For example, there are sugar and corn subsidies. However, one of the sweeteners used in soft drinks is high fructose corn syrup, which is obtained from cereals. If the new tax soda pass, which means that our government will also provide subsidies in the corn business, and taxation of other products, using ingredients derived from corn. Monitoring of all expenses and tax collection is a great loss of government resources. This is by far altogether deny the impact of soft drink companies to use the media to young people and adults in the purchase and consumption of their products. If there are no ads, soda consumption has plummeted, while the obesity epidemic will begin to reverse. Health costs would ease, but we are into a healthy adult in the United States the next generation. Mainstream media: the mainstream media to run the course of the disease, Tissy will be coordinated with the idea. It is from a company from advertising, selling soft drinks and sweetened beverages large part of the direct revenue, will promote the products directly harm children and young people to do business. But it is commercial, the media did not feel any special responsibility to protect at-risk products, only the person in payment of wages. This is why they opened the publicity dangerous, deadly drugs and other products, their advertising of junk food and soda water, resulting in disease and design. There are many people selling a lot of money harmful, just like all other mainstream media, like their action films. If harmful foods and beverages, many newspapers, magazines and television programs advertising ban will collapse in a few weeks. The company’s waste products, maintain high profits in the mobile media ad spending. Never forget. . . Especially when you read the article about soda in the mainstream media article. Select one: the child or at a later company, the United States must make a decision: We as a nation, continue to sacrifice our children’s health, in order to maintain our strong business more money? Either we sacrifice profits to strong corporate saving our children’s health? It really is the only option we have on this issue. We can not protect children’s health and harm sales of the product. At present, the situation has been decided at the expense of child protection corporation. This is the U.S. FDA, senators, congressmen (and women) of the position, and even the mainstream media. To heck with the kids, they said. We have to keep this economy running, even if it means selling poison our children! This is foolish, short-sighted attitude. But the ordinary course of business in the United States today: the victims of the future, creating the illusion of wealth in the present. However, even if all these soda companies continue to pump rake in more profits, the country’s economy really good? I think not. Long-term health treatment of disease caused by caustic soda consumption of health care costs equal to or more than any short-term interests of the economic activity generated by the sale of soft drink. Although it looks like in May of this fiscal year net profit in the long run, on a country’s net loss. When our political leaders began to demonstrate their understanding of these concepts – they started in accordance with the national interest – we have an existing medical emergency from the current chaos in the future. We can, of course, around this country and the elimination of almost all obesity, cancer, diabetes, heart disease and other chronic diseases, degradation, it will take bold decisions, in direct violation of the world’s most powerful corporate interests of some of profiteering by . It may never happen. Generate much profit poisoning of children to see it stop. Media to make money, politicians get campaign contributions, so that they can sell them in the office and business products from harmful to its pocket obscene profits. Therefore, we end up with the fat cats fat and adult children who rake the country soda company’s profits, even in strange, why their child has diabetes, I can not concentrate in school. If it were not so sad, the whole thing is actually interesting. We do this to myself. We are poisoning our children and called it “profitable.” In addition, we have the American people continue to allow this to happen, day after day, year after year, our bankruptcy, the nausea trick. I am all newspapers, television news, sports events and a website to accept advertising from the soda companies: you are part of the problem! Agreed to promote these products through direct damage to the reader, thereby contributing to the disease and the health of a culture of death. Greed is a powerful Western world, and often shrouded sympathy. In today’s world, compassionate rapacious advantage, no one dared to release soda and sugary drinks. But we do not live in this world we live in a world rooted in the United States, through greed and flagrant buckishness. Have accumulated wealth in the world’s richest push some products, mainly harm or kill children. This is really big pharmaceutical companies and big tobacco companies and junk food giants.